On 31 May 2015, the parties agreed to reach consensus on contentious issues such as federalism and ethnicity and to adopt an accelerated approach to drafting a constitution. On 9 June, 4 major political parties reached a 16-point agreement to address the contentious issues.1 The draft constitution was presented to the Constituent Assembly on 30 June. The draft constitution was adopted for public debate on 7 July.2 The draft constitution stipulates that Nepal should have eight provinces based on five identity criteria (ethnicity/community, language, culture, geography/territorial continuity and historical continuity) and four capacity criteria (economic interdependence and capacity; state of progress in infrastructure development, opportunities; the availability of natural resources; administrative feasibility). The Government of Nepal will form a federal commission to recommend the demarcation of the federal provinces. Two-thirds of all members of provincial assemblies will appoint the provinces. The draft constitution provides for the establishment of an inclusive National Commission to protect and promote the interests of ethnic and minority groups. The Korean War is an example of a conflict ending in a ceasefire rather than a peace treaty with the Korean ceasefire agreement. However, this war never ended technically because a final peace treaty or settlement was never concluded. [30] The two parties met regularly, reviewed and revised the agreement or a specific deadline in the agreement. They also concluded an additional agreement to deal with the problems of the agreement.

For example, the parties agreed to hold elections to the Constituent Assembly in 2008. While the former rebel party and other parties believed that the unity government would be ideal for drafting and promulgating a constitution and concluding the peace process, the formation of the government of national unity did not take place this year. Alongside the strikes and politicization of Nepal`s education sector, the Maoist leader warned in December 2010 that „his party would turn all universities and schools in the country into `barracks` if the conspiracies against peace and the new constitution do not falter.” 1 Despite this warning and the inability of the Constituent Assembly to complete the draft Constitution on time, there have been no reports of schools being turned into barracks. There have also been no reported cases of detention of teachers and educational institutions. When the conflict ended in 2006, the Royal Nepalese Army (RNA) numbered more than 91,000 men. The number of employees increased sharply, from 45,000 in 1990. In 2011, the Nepal Army (NA) had 105,500 troops, according to the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. [fn]”Nepal Military Strength, Nepal Military Strength Detail by the numbers,” accessed August 8, 2011, www.globalfirepower.com.

[/efn_note] The PCA called for the inclusive democratization of the NA as well as the integration of Maoist fighters. To ensure that this happens, the CPA has established a commission appointed by Cabinet. However, these changes did not take place in 2006. After the elections to the Constituent Assembly on 10 April 2008, the WPC was no longer necessary. [fn]”Nepal`s Election and Beyond”, International Crisis Group, Asia Report N°149, 2008. [/efn_note] Nevertheless, the National Planning Commission had developed a three-year interim plan setting out the objectives of the CMP on socio-economic issues. [fn]”Three-Year Interim Plan: Reconciliation Document”, National Planning Commission of the Government of Nepal, 2007. [/efn_note] One of the objectives of the CMP was the nationalization of royal property. This has been implemented, but other provisions relating to socio-economic development, such as the reconstruction of destroyed infrastructure, the common development strategy and effective social reforms and social protection programmes, the application of educational and health institutions as zones of peace, the creation of a favourable environment for investment, the indictment of defaulting debtors and the end of strikes and bandas have not been implemented. or injured.

The establishment of a TRC was delayed as a necessary balance between peace and justice had not yet been achieved and further inclusive consultations with stakeholders needed to take place. In this context, OHCHR-Nepal reported that the Ministry of Peace and Reconciliation had conducted consultations on the draft law.1 Although the draft law did not meet international standards, the Government sent a draft law to the Legislative Parliament for consideration in November 2009. The draft law assigns criminal responsibility to those involved in enforced disappearances.2 However, the TRC was not established in 2009. In December 2011, the main political parties agreed to integrate 6,500 Maoist fighters into the Nepal Army.1 To begin the integration process, the parties agreed to allow the Special Committee to re-examine combatants in seven main and 21 satellite neighbourhoods. Of the 19,602 Maoist combatants who met the criteria for reinstatement in the UNMIN review, 17,074 combatants participated, of whom 9,705 chose to join the State Army.2 After the re-establishment of the House of Representatives, the seven-party government began consulting with coalition leaders and Maoists in order to remove power from the king and draft a transitional constitution. This process began before the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement on 21 November 2006. In June 2006, the Government of Nepal and the Maoists agreed to form an Interim Committee for Draft Constitutions (ICDC) to finalize the draft transitional constitution within 15 days. On July 7, 2006, the Government requested the ICDC to begin its work. The Committee presented the draft Transitional Constitution on 25 August 2006.

The modalities of the transitional government have been explained in the Transitional Constitution. However, the promulgation of the constitution has been delayed until the agreement on the implementation of the supervision of the Arms and Army Administration (AMMAA) begins. This was determined in accordance with the Comprehensive Peace Agreement signed on 21 November 2006 and the Arms and Army Management Control signed on 8 November 2006. [fn]”ANNEX 2 IN RELATION TO CLAUSE (2) OF ARTICLE 167″, Interim Constitution of Nepal, 2007. [/efn_note] Despite candidate Nixon`s promise of „peace with honor,” the stalemate would continue for three and a half years of public and secret meetings in Paris. Two key issues had been blocked by both sides. Washington wanted to drive all troops out of North Vietnam; Hanoi rejected any South Vietnamese interim government in which its leader Nguyen Van Thieu was involved. In June 1969, the first troop withdrawals were carried out by the United States as part of its „Vietnamization Plan,” according to which the South Vietnamese would gradually assume full military responsibility for the war while continuing to be supplied with American weapons. The lack of formation of a unity government meant that the Constituent Assembly had not fulfilled its task of drafting a final draft Constitution. Other reasons were the reluctance of the Maoist party to initiate the rehabilitation of its fighters, and the ideological division between the Maoist party and the other parties, since the Maoists had advocated for the „constitution of the people” and the other parties were in favor of a fully „democratic” „constitution”. HQ`s mandate was extended for the second time in May 2011, this time for three months. This extension expires on August 28, 2011.

It has been reported that the three main parties have agreed to establish a State Restructuring Commission, which is expected to recommend to the Constituent Assembly a viable model for the federal provincial system in Nepal.1 The Constitutional Commission has proposed a model of mixed governance.2 However, these developments have not been able to bring together all political parties and stakeholders. Among the remaining obstacles to the completion of the constitution are disputes over the restructuring of the State, the integration and rehabilitation of Maoist combatants and the form of government. The lack of consensus among the political parties complicated the drafting of the constitution. At the 2006 CPA, the parties agreed to restructure the state to address the grievances of indigenous and marginalized groups. The preliminary constitutional process included contributions from indigenous and marginalized groups. Weapons belonging to the Maoists were safely stored and monitored by UNMIN. The Nepal Army, which corresponded to this number, stored the same amount of weapons. UNMIN left Nepal in January 2011, after which the Special Committee began monitoring cantons and weapons. When the deadline for the extension of the Constituent Assembly became obvious, the Nepali Congress Party demanded, as a precondition for the extension of the CA`s mandate, that weapons stored in the neighborhoods be handed over to the government and that State Security personnel be used to monitor cantonal sites.1 Ultimately, the Maoists agreed to return their own security. But refused to hand over the key to the weapons container. On August 7, 2011, however, Maoist fighters were not allowed to return to duty as security guards for their leaders.2 On November 1, 2011, the main political parties (Nepal Congress, Communist Party of Nepal – United Marxists and Leninists, Communist Party of Nepal – United Maoists and Samyukta Loktantrik Madhesi Morcha) agreed on seven points.

One of the provisions of the agreement was to form a group of AC experts instead of a constitutional commission for state restructuring.2 The 2006 CPA provided for the creation of a constitutional commission for state restructuring, which could deal with complaints from ethnic and indigenous groups isolated from state power.